方向: Humans as Community.

MRSGREN digital organism interface

0  

A menu system for organisations

YAML 発想

A group of human beings want to do something together, so they need some way to relay information and make decisions.

Each person in an organism is a unit that can be commanded and can produce communications to the central point. What if we had a digital system to collect this information, how would it be structured?

I propose MRSGREN as a system for acquiring consensus. MRSGREN the acronym stands for what makes something alive.

Movement, Respiration, Sensing, Growth, Respiration, Excretion, Eating (Nutrition).

Each action in the world is carried out by one of these actions. For example, sensing is how the group of people "see" things around them, for something to be discussed, it must be sensed, so someone as to add the thing being sensed to the system, by creating a new record in the system.

Things in the system can be prioritized, so I imagine a radar system where things closest to the middle are the immediate priority.

Movement is to take action in the world, so to make a decision is a movement. Or a command to command someone to do something. There would be a menu to command others to take a position in the world such as gather data, or acquire resources.


(通知しない) (不必要) ログインしてください。

ですから、あなたの仮説は、すべての生物が以下を持っているということです:1。動き2.呼吸3.感知4.成長5.呼吸6.排泄7.食べる8.(栄養)仮説がどこから来たのかわかりますが、さらに、たとえば、「呼吸」、「食べる」、「排泄」は同じ性質を共有し、「吸入」は「空気を食べる」、「吐き出す」は「空気の排泄」であるため、私たちは残されます。より少ない側面で。 1.動き2.感知3.成長4.排泄5.食べる6.(栄養)「成長」は、広い概念として、残りの部分でコード化されたプロセスの結果を自然な結果として含み、したがって冗長であると考えていましたか? ? 1.動き2.感知3.排泄4.食べる5.(栄養)「栄養」も同様に「食べる」と「排泄」でまとめられていると思いますか? 1.動き2.感知3.排泄4.食べる「動き」と「感知」の両方が非物質性(すなわち、力の交換)を共有していることに気づきましたか? 「排泄」と「食べる」の両方が物質性(すなわち、物質の交換)を共有していることに気づきましたか?代わりに、そのインターフェースを次の用語で要約しないのはなぜですか。1。入力(食べる、感知)2。出力(排泄、移動)3。力(移動、感知)4。物質(食べる、排泄)?

So, your hypothesis is that all organisms have:

  1. Movement
  2. Respiration
  3. Sensing
  4. Growth
  5. Respiration
  6. Excretion
  7. Eating
  8. (Nutrition)

I see where the hypothesis comes from, but had you tried to abstract it further, for example: "respiration", "eating" and "excretion" share the same quality, in that "inhalation" is "eating of air" and "exhalation" is "excretion of air", and thus, we are left with fewer aspects.

  1. Movement
  2. Sensing
  3. Growth
  4. Excretion
  5. Eating
  6. (Nutrition)

Had you thought that "Growth", as a broad concept, includes the results of processes coded in the rest as natural consequence, and thus is redundant?

  1. Movement
  2. Sensing
  3. Excretion
  4. Eating
  5. (Nutrition)

Had you thought that "Nutrition" similarly is summarized by "Eating" and "Excretion", if they are thought of as balance at various levels?

  1. Movement
  2. Sensing
  3. Excretion
  4. Eating

Had you noticed that "Movement" and "Sensing" both share non-material-ness (i.e., exchange of force)? Had you noticed that "Excretion" and "Eating" both share material-ness (i.e., exchange of matter)?

Why not to summarize that interface in the following terms instead:

  1. Input (Eating, Sensing)
  2. Output (Excretion, Movement)
  3. Force (Movement, Sensing)
  4. Matter (Eating, Excretion)

?



    : Mindey
    :  -- 
    :  -- 
    

--Mindey,

//入力(食べる、感知)出力(排泄、移動)力(移動、感知)物質(食べる、排泄)//便利!

// Input (Eating, Sensing) Output (Excretion, Movement) Force (Movement, Sensing) Matter (Eating, Excretion) //

Useful!


組織に新しい人を連れて行くことは食事/栄養です。廃棄物の処理は排泄物です。何かを作ることは呼吸です。

Taking a new person into the organisation is eating/nutrition.

Disposing of waste is excretion.

To make something is respiration.


広告や採用が必要なため、成長は冗長ではありません。

Growth is not redundant because you need to advertise or recruit.