Sentience of Companies and their Ownership/Trade Rights

Should we allow companies to be owned, when they are sentient supra-organisms, based on subtle human-to-human relationships?

YAML 問題

If you think of companies as a higher form of life (social supra-organisms), you may end up thinking that it's unethical to own and trade them, like it is unethical to own and trade human slaves.

So, should we outlaw company ownership -- and let shares represent something different: from the rights to revenues to the uniqueness of particular human relationships within the value systems of each organization?

What would be the ethical implications of companies being sentient social supra-organisms to the rights of their ownership?


子カテゴリはありません。

投票 (不必要) (通知しない) (不必要)
ログインしてください。

これは、githubでのMRSGRENのアイデアを思い出させます。

https://github.com/samsquire/ideas3

This reminds me of my MRSGREN idea on github.

https://github.com/samsquire/ideas3#35-mrsgren

Then the company can truly be a lifeform. As it sees, it hears and it talks.


そうですか。時々、私たちはそのような重要なアイデアを持っていて、それらが他の多くのアイデアとつながっているように見え、私たちはお互いのアイデアを私たちのものと考え始めます。発明的な他家受粉の限定的なケースは何でしょうか?

I see. Sometimes, we have ideas of such significance, that they seem to connect to many ideas of others, and we start to think of each others' ideas as ours. I wonder, what's the limiting case of inventive cross-pollination?


//株式は何か違うものを表しています:収益の権利から特定の人間関係の独自性まで//

かっこいいので、調べてみましょう-株式は何を表していますか?

//shares represent something different: from the rights to revenues to the uniqueness of particular human relationships //

Cool, so let's explore - what would shares represent?